DEPARTWENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO6791-14
23 July 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: A,
CUM
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (PC) memo 1430 Ser 812/0186 of
1 Jul 2014
{3} Emaii from Mr. Ed West, NETPDTC and Ms. Anna Nahulak, BCNR
dated 15 Jul 2014
i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that che
applicable naval record be corrected to show that he received two
Passed but Not Advanced (PNA) points from the advancement cycle 212,
that he had 11 award points, ang to show that he was advanced to
E-6/MAi from the March 2014 advancement cycle 223 due to the added PNA
points and 11 award points.
2. The Board, consisting of Messers. gsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as foliows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ail
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosures (2) and (3}, the
office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the request
has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and {3}, the
Docket No.NR6791-14
Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, 4s
follows:
a. Petitioner was given two PNA points from the Navy-wide
advancement cycle 212.
». Petitioner has 11 award points towards the March 2014 Navy-
wide advancement cycle.
c. Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MAL from the March 2014 Navy-
wide advancement exam with an effective date yet to be determined by
the Naval Personnel Command. :
d. That a copy of this Report of proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records {32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)} it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter. 9
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN D Pp . CASH
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
Foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
fa), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.
22 duly 2014 ek, feat
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2970 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her Performance Mark Average (PMA) for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle 212 should have been 3.8 vice 3.7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3502-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2013, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00082-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was either advanced to E-4/LS3 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam or received Passed but Not Advanced (PNA) points from the March 2009 advancement exam cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00712-11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. Upon being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status in December 2010, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. He had advanced...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07085-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. In September 2010, with his final adjudicated clearance, he participated in the E6/AE1 Navy-wide advancement examination and was selected and advanced with an effective date of 16 June 2011. j. Petitioner has applied to this Board seeking to have his E6/AE1 advancement exams validated retroactively for PNA points to apply toward his September 2009 advancement exam. NPC and CNO...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6859 14
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments {2} Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 8112/0254 - of 13 Aug 2014 i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04882-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06079-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate her E-6/YN1 Navy-wide advancement examinations and show that that her E-6/YN1 examinations from September 2008 through September 2010 be validated and receive PNA points to be applied to her March 2011 exam. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10262 11
The Board, consisting of Messrs. pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 June 2012 and, pursuant to 4ts regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be teken on the available evidence of record. In March 2011, after being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. VOZ62-12 that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06139-11
es Upon being notified of the deficiency in his clearance status, in late May 2010, Petitioner re-submitted the required security questionnaire documents to obtain the required security clearance. * 1. Review of Petitioner's last Worksheet, (enclosure 4) for the March 2010 exam also fails to disclose any evidence that Petitioner was notified or aware of the requirement to hold a security clearance in order to participate in the advancement cycle. c. If the PNA points from the re-validated...